Table Of Contents

Poppy Morandin.


A parliamentary committee has found that criminal enterprises adapted during the COVID-19 pandemic by infiltrating food delivery companies and using them to deliver drugs across Australia.

The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Law Enforcement focused on trends and changes in criminal activity and law enforcement as a result of the pandemic.

The committee, led by Brisbane Liberal MP Julian Simmonds, was told how organised crime groups had been “very adaptive and clever” in the use of the “unregulated food delivery industry”.

The report explained how the domestic delivery of illicit drugs diversified as a result of travel restrictions and the resourcefulness of organised crime gangs.

“There’s a lot of app food delivery drivers coming to people’s doors, and it’s a largely unregulated industry at the moment,” said Mr Simmonds.

“When organised criminal gangs see a lack of regulation, they will see a way in and they will take advantage of it, and we saw them using that as a delivery mechanism when people were otherwise not able to move around.” he continued.

The report states how the system was taken advantage of due to limited measures in place to track and identify couriers, and delivery content as well as the lack of certification of food delivery workers.

It has recommended that the food delivery industry be regulated through the introduction of guidelines and protocols similar to that of other delivery services.

“Measures could be designed to establish a clear chain of movement and possession of a product.” it explains.

Despite these claims, leading food delivery apps such as UberEats and Menulog, have insisted that they regularly monitor their platforms for illegal activity.

“Our dedicated law enforcement response team, which includes former Australian police officers, is on-hand to assist police in their investigation into any such matter.” refuted a spokesperson from UberEats.

Menulog also explained how all couries “must submit a police background check prior to commencing with Menulog” and that it ultimately “condemns such behaviour and would not tolerate it happening on its network”.

Latest crime statistics show that figures relating to dealing and trafficking in drugs such as cannabis and amphetamines have remained stable over the past 2 years, whilst dealing and trafficking in cocaine has risen by 7.5%.

Drug Charges NSW

Pursuant to section 25(1) of the Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) (the Act), a person who supplies, or who knowingly takes part in the supply of, an amount of a prohibited drug, is guilty of an offence.

A prohibited drug includes cocaine, cannabis, MDMA, amphetamine, heroin, and ketamine among other drugs listed in Schedule 1 of the Act.

‘Supply’ is provided with a considerably extended definition, with section 3(1) stating that it includes:

  • Sell and distribute,
  • Agreeing to supply,
  • Offering to supply,
  • Keeping or having in possession for supply,
  • Sending, forwarding, delivering, or receiving for supply, or
  • Authorising, directing, causing, suffering, permitting, or attempting any of those acts or things.

The maximum penalty applicable to supply of a prohibited drug will ultimately depend on the quantity of drugs involved.

The Act distinguishes between a small, traffickable, indictable, commercial, and large commercial quantities.

Each prohibited drug has its own unique quantities that correspond to these categories, under Schedule 1.

Section 33 prescribes that where supply involves an amount of a prohibited drug which is not less than the commercial quantity applicable to the prohibited drug, the maximum penalty applicable is a $385,000 and/or 20 years imprisonment.

However, if this offence relates to cannabis plant or cannabis leaf the maximum penalty applicable is a fine of $385,000 and/or 15 years in jail.

In the event supply involves not less than the large commercial quantity of the prohibited plant or drug concerned, the maximum penalty applicable is a fine of $550,000 and/or life imprisonment.

These offences are strictly indictable, which means that it cannot be dealt with in the Local Court and therefore will be heard before the District Court.

Questions on drug laws? Call our drug lawyers Sydney based today.

About Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia

Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia are Leading Criminal Defence Lawyers, Delivering Exceptional Results in all Australian Courts.

Related articles

See all articles

Coward Punch: Sucker Punch Laws in Australia

Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia 4th December 2023

Is Euthanasia Legal in Australia?

Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia 29th November 2023

What is the Youth Koori Court?

Poppy Morandin 29th November 2023

What is a Mandatory Disease Testing Order?

Poppy Morandin 27th November 2023


  What Our Clients Say

I was represented by Emerson Lamarre from CDLA for driving offences and possession of weapon charges which he got all chargers dropped for me. I could not have asked for… (read full review) By B.F. from Sydney on 22/11/2023
I am incredibly grateful to Alex and Emerson, who provided exceptional representation in my recent court case. Their extensive expertise and strategic approach gave me the best result in court.… (read full review) By J.C. from Sydney on 27/11/2023
Ibrahim and Emerson were amazing as my lawyers for court. They were professional, knowledgeable, and provided excellent support throughout my whole case. They went above and beyond to make sure… (read full review) By E.A. from Sydney on 24/11/2023
Nothing but 5 star service and professionalism from Sean of CDLA. He is empathetic and sincere and experienced in the criminal justice system. My case was won all because of… (read full review) By M.A. from Sydney on 24/11/2023
I hired Emerson from Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia for my case. I am satisfied with the decision and now I am free from the criminal record. Thank you for your… (read full review) By Y.K. from Sydney on 23/10/2023

Free Conference Booking Form

Follow Us