Apprehended Violence Orders Against Children in New South Wales

In New South Wales, apprehended violence orders (‘AVOs’) may be sought against young persons.

AVOs are court orders which seek to protect a person from another who causes them to fear for their safety, by imposing certain conditions.

They are essentially civil proceedings and are not considered ‘criminal’. However, breaching an AVO is a criminal offence, which carries a maximum penalty of 2 years imprisonment and/or a $5,500 fine.

There are two types of AVOs being ‘domestic’ (which can be imposed upon people such as a family member, spouse, or ex-partner) or ‘personal’ (which can be imposed upon people such as a neighbour, co-worker, or friend).

They can also be ‘private’ (when initiated by the person seeking protection) or they can be initiated by the police, on behalf of the person in need of protection (‘PINOP’).

However, if a child is under the age of 16, an AVO can only be taken out against them by the police.

In most cases related to young persons, the application will be brought by police.

Prior to the matter being heard in court, police have the power to impose temporary orders, referred to as a ‘provisional order’. Where a young person is under the age of 16 years of age, the police cannot impose orders that prevent them from living in their home.

Condition 1 is a mandatory condition that will appear on all AVOs, which details that the defendant must not do any of the following to the protected person/s or anyone that they have a domestic relationship with:

  1. assault or threaten them,
  2. stalk, harass or intimidate them,
  3. intentionally or recklessly destroy or damage any property or harm an animal that belongs to or is in the possession of them.

Additional orders that may be sought include orders about contact which will state: ‘you must not approach the protected person or contact them in any way, unless the contact is through a lawyer.’

They may also include orders about where you cannot go or whether you can be in someone’s presence after consuming drugs or alcohol.

AVOs sought against young persons under the age of 18 are heard in the Children’s Court.

When the application for a domestic or personal violence order has its first court date, the Children’s Court Magistrate will enquire whether the young person would participate in family, relationship or individual counselling or other interventions, such as mediation.

This seeks to address the issues which led to the making of the application.

If a Court Support Officer (‘CSO’) is available, the young person will be directed to speak with them.

The CSO can then carry out a brief assessment which seeks to determine whether there is suitable counselling or mediation available for the young person and, in appropriate cases, their family.

During this assessment, the CSO may speak with members of the young person’s family.

If a CSO is not available, the young person, with the assistance of their legal representative, should ascertain the availability of suitable counselling or other intervention services.

Where the young person agrees to undertake counselling or engage in other interventions, their legal representative will inform the court of the relevant counselling or other intervention service and, if it is known, when the young person will have their first appointment with the service.

The Magistrate will record this information on the court file.

If the prosecutor and young person consent, the court will then make an interim AVO and adjourn the proceedings for 3 months to allow the child to engage with the relevant counselling or other intervention service.

Where there is no suitable counselling services or other intervention services available, or the young person does not wish to participate in this, the court may nonetheless make an interim AVO, but instead adjourn the proceedings for 5 months.

During the adjournment period (whether 3 or 5 months), if there are no breaches of the interim order, the application may be withdrawn and dismissed by the court on the date the matter is adjourned to.

The other options include the court making a final AVO by consent of the young person, or the young person choosing to contest the order, leading to the court making directions for the matter to be set down for a defended hearing.

However, due to the benefits of consenting to an interim order, within the matter being withdrawn and dismissed if there are no breaches, it is not often that a young person would be advised to defend a domestic or personal violence order application.

This is due to how a defended hearing may be listed many months away, and the young person will be subject to an interim order for this period in any event. There is also always the risk of ‘losing’ the defended hearing, and a final order being made for a further period of time.

It is important to note that if the person in need of protection on the final domestic or personal violence order is another child, this can lead to issues with the young person obtaining a Working with Children Check.

About Poppy Morandin

Poppy Morandin is the managing law clerk and an integral part of the team of criminal lawyers at Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia . She's also a part of CDLA's content article production team. Poppy is passionate about law reform and criminal justice.

Related articles

See all articles

Complete Guide on Apprehended Violence Orders (AVO) in NSW

Jimmy Singh 27th September 2023

Can You Revoke an Expired AVO in NSW?

Poppy Morandin 31st May 2023

Can You Contact an Ex if You’re Subject to an AVO?

Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia 7th April 2023

New Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme in NSW | “The Right To Ask”

Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia 10th February 2023


  What Our Clients Say

I was represented by Emerson Lamarre from CDLA for driving offences and possession of weapon charges which he got all chargers dropped for me. I could not have asked for… (read full review) By B.F. from Sydney on 22/11/2023
I am incredibly grateful to Alex and Emerson, who provided exceptional representation in my recent court case. Their extensive expertise and strategic approach gave me the best result in court.… (read full review) By J.C. from Sydney on 27/11/2023
Ibrahim and Emerson were amazing as my lawyers for court. They were professional, knowledgeable, and provided excellent support throughout my whole case. They went above and beyond to make sure… (read full review) By E.A. from Sydney on 24/11/2023
Nothing but 5 star service and professionalism from Sean of CDLA. He is empathetic and sincere and experienced in the criminal justice system. My case was won all because of… (read full review) By M.A. from Sydney on 24/11/2023
I hired Emerson from Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia for my case. I am satisfied with the decision and now I am free from the criminal record. Thank you for your… (read full review) By Y.K. from Sydney on 23/10/2023

Free Conference Booking Form

Follow Us