Production, Dissemination or Possession of Child Abuse Material in NSW

Poppy Morandin.


A Catholic priest in Sydney’s inner west and a police officer have been charged after an investigation into alleged possession and distribution of child abuse material.

The charges follow an investigation by the Professional Standards Command in May, following reports that child abuse material was being stored and distributed on an electronic device.

It led to the arrest of 62-year-old Father Joseph Kolodziej, who was taken to Burwood police station and charged with possessing child abuse material and using a carriage service for child abuse material.

The former parish priest at All Hallows Catholic Parish Five Dock, was requested to step down from his public role at the parish and its neighbouring primary school.

Mr Kolodziej had previously been the parish priest at St Mary Queen of Heaven in Georges Hall, which he left for his most recent position in Five Dock in late January of this year.

In that role, he was a leader of St Mary’s Catholic Primary School Georges Hall.

It is alleged that the child abuse material was found on his phone.

Mr Kolodziej is due to face Burwood Local Court on July 13.

Police executed a further search warrant at a Georges Hall address after they charged Mr Kolodziej.

At the scene, they arrested a 49-year-old police sergeant attached to a specialist command and seized electronic storage devices.

The officer was taken to Liverpool police station and charged with possessing child abuse material.

He remains unnamed and is reportedly suspended with pay at this stage.

He is due to face Liverpool Local Court on June 21.

Child abuse material offences have risen almost 30% over the last 24 months, according to the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.

Production, Dissemination or Possession of Child Abuse Material in NSW

In New South Wales, section 91FB of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) defines “child abuse material” as material that depicts or describes, in a way that reasonable person would regard as being, in all the circumstances, offensive, such as:

  • A person who is, appears to be or is implied to be, a child as a victim of torture, cruelty, or physical abuse,
  • A person who is, appears to be or is implied to be, a child engaged in or apparently engaged in a sexual pose or sexual activity (whether or not in the presence of other persons),
  • A person who is, appears to be or is implied to be, a child in the presence of another person who is engaged or apparently engaged in a sexual pose or sexual activity, or
  • The private parts of a person who is, appears to be or is implied to be, a child.

Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether reasonable persons would regard particular material as being, in all the circumstances, offensive, include:

  • the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults,
  • the literary, artistic, or educational merit (if any) of the material,
  • the journalistic merit (if any) of the material, being the merit of the material as a record or report of a matter of public interest, and
  • the general character of the material (including whether it is of a medical, legal, or scientific character).

A ‘child’ means a person under the age of 16 years.

Pursuant to section 91H, production, dissemination or possession of child abuse material is criminalised.

‘Possession’ includes physical custody or control of material or data.

‘Dissemination’ includes:

  • Sending, supplying, exhibiting, transmitting, or communicating to another
  • Making available for access by another, and
  • Entering an agreement or arrangement to do so.

‘Production’ includes:

  • filming, photographing, printing or otherwise making,
  • altering or manipulating, and
  • entering an agreement or arrangement to do so.

The maximum penalty applicable if found guilty of the offence is 10 years imprisonment.

During sentencing, general deterrence is a paramount consideration for offences involving child abuse/child pornography material (R v Booth [2009] NSWCCA 89).

Furthermore, it has been held that as the offence of possessing child pornography is frequently committed by persons of prior good character, it is legitimate for a court to give less weight to good character as a mitigating factor.

Other factors considered when assessing the severity of the offence include whether actual children are present in the material, the nature and content of the material, including the age of the children and the gravity of the sexual activity portrayed and the number of images or items of material.

Questions? Get in touch with our friendly criminal lawyers Sydney based today.

About Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia

Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia are Leading Criminal Defence Lawyers, Delivering Exceptional Results in all Australian Courts.

Related articles

See all articles

Strip Search Laws: Your Rights at Music Festivals in New South Wales

Jimmy Singh 6th December 2023

Coward Punch: Sucker Punch Laws in Australia

Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia 4th December 2023

Is Euthanasia Legal in Australia?

Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia 29th November 2023

What is the Youth Koori Court?

Poppy Morandin 29th November 2023


  What Our Clients Say

I was represented by Emerson Lamarre from CDLA for driving offences and possession of weapon charges which he got all chargers dropped for me. I could not have asked for… (read full review) By B.F. from Sydney on 22/11/2023
I am incredibly grateful to Alex and Emerson, who provided exceptional representation in my recent court case. Their extensive expertise and strategic approach gave me the best result in court.… (read full review) By J.C. from Sydney on 27/11/2023
Ibrahim and Emerson were amazing as my lawyers for court. They were professional, knowledgeable, and provided excellent support throughout my whole case. They went above and beyond to make sure… (read full review) By E.A. from Sydney on 24/11/2023
Nothing but 5 star service and professionalism from Sean of CDLA. He is empathetic and sincere and experienced in the criminal justice system. My case was won all because of… (read full review) By M.A. from Sydney on 24/11/2023
I hired Emerson from Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia for my case. I am satisfied with the decision and now I am free from the criminal record. Thank you for your… (read full review) By Y.K. from Sydney on 23/10/2023

Free Conference Booking Form

Follow Us